Sunday, 20 September 2009
Ad Occidentem...
A blogger who styles himself Fr John Hunwicke, an Anglican priest living in Oxford, has an interesting post about the complex liturgical questions of ''ad Orientem'' and ''versus Populum'' (''versus Turbam'' I call it) in a Catholic church in Eynsham, where the Sanctuary is in fact at the West end of the Church (with the result that with celebrations of Mass versus Turbam, the Celebrant is in fact facing the correct liturgical direction, whereas the people are not). I once read that in the Patriarchal basilicas in Rome (which are also built in this way, although for purely practical reasons), the lay people would turn around to face the East during certain parts of the Liturgy - this seems to be a good idea, since even in private prayer, to turn Eastwards is salutary, but what happens at the Consecration when you have your back to the Blessed Sacrament? Of course, the idea of the Pope being ''privileged'' to celebrate Mass facing the people soon developed, out of peoples' ignorance (even in the Papal Court) and we thus see images of later Popes in foreign countries celebrating Mass in the same way (for no valid reason whatsoever). There was no excuse for that kind of ignorance. Ignorance of the Liturgy (not to mention laziness) has thus been a contributing factor in later liturgical ''reform,'' particularly the unfortunate changes of the 1950s and 1960s, the Smoke of Satan and all that! It may have been consoling for some traditionalists to hear Paul VI bemoan those changes afterwards, but it was a bit late, and he did approve of them...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
All the the reform took place in an age where ultramontanism was rife. How can view the reforms of St. Pius X, Pius XII, Blessed John XXIII and Paul VI as anything other than extraordinary acts of ultramontanism? The so-called neo-Catholics today commit the same error, and error which is equally (if not more) damaging than modernism.
ReplyDeleteYes Paul, toto corde consentio. The dangers of Ultramontanism are too great to go into in any detail in this comment, but 20th century liturgical reform is a grotesque spectacle of this gross error - the idea that Popes can one day say: ''Do what I want, I'm the Pope,'' essentially making themselves, in absurd arrogance, the arbiter rather than the servant of Revelation (which is the only true understanding of Papal Infallibility). It is quite contrary to the Tradition of the Church, and so are the fruits of those liturgical reforms - they are completely aliturgical.
ReplyDeleteI really should check my comments before I post them. So many typos.
ReplyDelete